Katie Price has them REALLY BAD – a horrible job. The outfit she wears makes it look like her nipples cannot be where they should be (assuming the boobs were real). Fashions like that have only three reasons: people like Katie have bad taste and low morals and men who think that’s really sexy. She looks like a $50 stoned hooker.
Victoria Beckham has them too, pretty awful, just a little smaller, and they look a bit better. But they are obviously not real. But she at least has some pretty good fashion sense and keeps them covered up, at least most of the time.
The goal of cosmetic surgery should be to improve certain areas of the human body and to have the result look as if you were born to look that way.
So be realistic if you want to change your breasts. Otherwise you end up in the freak show territory. These bad breast implants look as bad as Michael Jackson’s facial mutilation after his repeated cosmetic procedures. His nose did not look real. One look and you can tell some bad surgeon did it. There was a line that Michael crossed, in the 80s, which made his face look disfigured after additional surgeries.
The same can be said about breast implants… there is an obvious line that Katie and Victoria crossed. Women with normal looking cup size and well done implants have breasts that look real – the women can have the self-confidence of having nice breasts and no one can tell by looking at them that they are not real.
Why would anyone have surgery to advertise that they had the money to do it, but no brains to have it done right? Cosmetic surgeons should not operate on people who don’t want to look natural afterwards. They are still doctors and bound by the oath they all take. But there is so much money to be made that they do whatever the patient wants or else the patient gets it done elsewhere. A good doctor would turn a patient away from unnecessary or unnatural surgery. So as a test before choosing a surgeon it might be a good idea to ask about huge implants and see what the doctor says.
For some reason I think of Octomom when I look at Katie’s photo. I don’t understand what Katie gets out of flashing her silly unreals like that. Is she so delusional that she thinks they look good? They look about as appealing as a bad tattoo (photo above). It’s fun to look at it once – but imagine looking at it for the rest of your life? It’s as ridiculous as a poor couple buying a huge fake diamond engagement ring and trying to make believe it is a real diamond – but it is so large that it would cost more than everything else that they will ever own in their life time. Some people just can’t see reality for what it really is. How unreal is that?
What is wrong with people who have to have fake things? Isn’t life a thrill as it is? There is no time to waste on “fake anything”, there are so many great REAL things that we will never get to see or experience.
These 1/2 balls look just silly and stupid. Any woman who gets implants like these should see a psychiatrist or sue the surgeon. Any man who is attracted to artificial boobs like these is a fool - he can’t tell the difference between sexy fantasy and plastic surgery done wrong. Looks to me like Katie has stretch marks on the skin that’s been expanded way beyond capacity. If she does not have stretch marks now she will later on as she gets older and as her skin becomes thinner and less elastic. I wonder where these 1/2 balls will be when she is 60?
In December 2007, Price underwent surgery in the U.S. to reduce the size of her breast implants and also had rhinoplasty. However, she was not happy with the results of her breast implants, so returned to Beverly Hills, California in July 2008 for corrective surgery. She returned to the UK five days later, showing off much smaller breasts, a size 32C.
So she has already had three surgeries on her breasts – how old is she? In the future she will need more surgery to keep up with her aging tissues.
The photo is taken during their 10th anniversary cruise early July, according to dailymail. If she had her implants changed for smaller ones in June, I’d hate to think what she looked like before. All the repeated surgeries should signal all women wanting implants to really think about what they want. Do you have money for a second or third surgery to make “them” look and feel right? Don’t forget that large breasts get in the way during sports and other physical activities. But if your main activities consist of walking in high heels and laying in bed, well, I guess you deserve nothing but the BIG ones.
There are many implants that are not done right, really bad or with medical complications. The three cases I am looking at here, photos below, are just the tip of the implants gone wrong problems – getting the sizes and locations right and the nipples pointing in the right direction, with everything looking symmetrical and natural, requires great care and experience from the surgeon. What complicates the procedure is the fact that the breasts look different when the woman stands and lays down. The size of the natural breasts and nipples can also make the job difficult.
These photos should be enough to make a normal female reconsider implants or to make sure the results do not end up looking like these boobs or worse. How do you sue a doctor? Do you have the time and money to hire a lawyer? Will a jury think that both of your nipples should be pointing in a direction of your choice or where your nipples should be on your breasts? How can you prove it is the doctor’s fault and not yours because you insisted on boobs way too big for your skin and figure?
I can see the need for surgery in the BEFORE photos. But the first set of boobs are too big for her figure and will make her look fat with clothes on; and the doctor could not get her nipples right, they are pointing in different directions. She had asymmetrical nipples to begin with but that became worse after the implants.
The second set of boobs are just done all wrong and look lumpy – how did the doctor even do that? Looks like a rectangular implant was inserted on one side.
The third set of boobs got the nipples almost tucked under the arms. That’s because there was not enough skin between the side and the nipple to expand over the implant. The skin on the side is not as loose as the skin on the chest. If there is not enough skin to put the implants in and have the nipples point forwards then some skin stretching has to be done prior to surgery. Also breasts this size should not bulge outside the frame of the rib cage in the full frontal view, and there should be a gentle valley between the breasts. In the last photo, there is enough room in the middle for a 3rd breast or plenty of room for open heart surgery.
I would sue the doctor in all 3 cases but I am certain the contract these women had to sign explained this is what can happened so they are stuck with what they got unless they can afford a second corrective surgery, and put up with the pain again.
Latest news: Jury’s In – Liposuctioned Fat, A Viable Alternative to Breast Implants Read more about this brand new and natural enhancement at the bottom of this post. I don’t have a link.
Check this out: Animated site about cosmetic surgery procedures
*******
The last few photos are for laughs.
Sheyla Hershey has the biggest implants after nine operations. She is 38KKK. She had to go back to her native Brazil to get this surgery which is illegal in USA. Doctors think her breasts can explode. She had these huge implants done so that “people would remember her” Huh? 38KKK who? Remember her implants – not her. I am sure eventually someone will get bigger ones, records are there to be broken.
Norma Stitz stands for bigtits – she was not born with that name but she surely has natural big tits no doubt about it. She makes her living off of them.
Jury’s In – Liposuctioned Fat, A Viable Alternative to Breast Implants
Embargo for Release: Saturday, October 24, 2009
There’s been some debate over the safety and effectiveness of fat injections for cosmetic breast augmentation primarily due to a lack of research and concern that fat may calcify and obscure mammograms, be mistaken for cancer growths, or be re-absorbed by the body. But a new study presented at the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) Plastic Surgery 2009 conference, Oct. 23-27, in Seattle, found using liposuctioned fat for breast augmentation may be a viable option for some women. The study looked at 50 women, ages 17-63, who had 55 fat grafting procedures (5 women were grafted twice) to their breasts with fat taken from their upper thighs, etc. To help make room for the injected fat and to increase the grafts’ survival rate, patients wore a bra-like (external) tissue expander device several weeks before and after surgery. Long-term follow-up on patients ranged from 9 months to 5 years, with an average follow-up of 3 years.
The authors found:
•The procedure did not obscure mammography.
•No suspicious breast masses, nodules, or lesions that might interfere with cancer detection were reported.
•Excellent long term graft survival was achieved – graft survival averaged 85%.
•Average increase in breast volume at 6-12 months was 210 ml.
•Patients were pleased with the natural feel of their breasts and improved appearance of the liposuctioned areas.
•Procedure can safely be performed in 1.5 hours.
•Drawbacks included changes in breast volume were proportionate with BMI fluctuations and poor patient compliance with the use of the tissue expander device negatively affected breast volume.
By the Numbers:
Breast augmentation was the most popular cosmetic surgical procedure in 2008, with more than 307,000 procedures performed, according to the ASPS. It’s also the most commonly requested procedure among women.
Study: “Autologous Breast Augmentation with Liposuctioned Fat: A Fifty Patient Prospective Study Over Five Years” is being presented Sat., Oct. 24, 1:00 – 1:05PM PDT, at the Washington State Convention and Trade Center.
——————————————————————————–
Fat Injections Offer New “Perk” For Breast Lift Patients
Embargo for Release: Saturday, October 24, 2009
The majority of women who have a breast lift require some degree of augmentation to fill out their breasts, in which case, breast implants are typically used. But, a new study presented at the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) Plastic Surgery 2009 conference, Oct. 23-27, in Seattle, found injecting fat into the breasts offers breast lift patients a new option for creating volume, provides superior fullness, and reduces some rates of complication seen with implants. Forty-six patients received fat injections to their breasts following a lift. The fat was taken from areas like the thigh or abdomen on the patient’s body. After one-year, all patients had a significant improvement in breast size and shape and had breasts that were soft and natural in feel and appearance. Additionally, no abnormalities were reported in patients who had mammograms one-year postoperatively.
By the Numbers:
More than 92,000 breast lifts were performed in 2008, up 75 percent since 2000, according to the ASPS.
Study: “Single Staged Mastopexy with Autologous Fat Grafting” is being presented Sat., Oct. 24, 1:05 – 1:10PM PDT, at the Washington State Convention and Trade Center.
i think you make a point, but Victoria Beckham had breast augmentation? how did she do it? she had 4 or 5 kids. well i loss count now.